blog break  cp break  articles break  archives

logo
Thursday, January 04 2007

I Swear

Bret McAtee @ 7:34 pm
  • “Hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue.”  

Matthew Arnold  

Today was a first. Congressman Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim elected to Congress, used a Koran once owned by President Thomas Jefferson at his ceremonial swearing-in. In one sense we have to admire Congressman Ellison for his standing by his Islamic convictions. After decades of Congresspersons hypocritically using Bibles in order to make oaths that they quickly break Congressman Ellison broke with the past using a copy of the Koran which he clearly takes seriously.  

But there is another way to look at this scenario. What does it say about a people when they no longer even feel the necessity to be hypocritical? I mean at least in the past Congresspersons, for the most part, have felt the need to at least keep up the pretense of being Christian as seen in the use of a Bible to compound their sin of breaking oaths. I imagine for most of these elected official the only time they use the Bible is every two years when, out of a custom whose meaning has long been lost, they place their right hand upon God’s Word and promise to uphold a document that most of them clearly haven’t read and don’t have a clue about.   

I agree that hypocrisy is a nasty thing. How much more nasty will it be when the day comes that people no longer feel the need to be hypocritical? I find myself in the strange position of asking myself if it is better to have a Congress filled with people who feel the need to have some association (hypocritical though it certainly is) with Christian trappings or whether it is better to have a Congress filled with those who would rather swear on the Koran, or the Bhagavad-Gita or the Book of Mormon (paging Mitt Romney).

 

There will be those who object that the use of the book is merely symbolic and that one shouldn’t read too much into how these symbols are used. To such people I can only offer that symbols serve as the objective markers by which a people subjectively establish their identity. Symbols provide the liturgical context that people, in chameleon like fashion, change color in order to adapt to. Ellison’s symbolic use of the Koran is part of Multiculturalisms ongoing success in rearranging our National Liturgy and symbolic context to sanitize and remove the few remaining symbolic supports that prop up the remains of Christian culture in favor of the monoculture of multiculturalism.